(They won`t sign because they could lose the money they paid for the loan because of the voluntary reduction. We are negotiating for you to return the workers` money because it was not their decision to close. In fact, they wanted to finish the 10 years.) You can write to your employer that before you are included in certain trainings/seminars, etc., you should get your consent. You cannot use this clause to keep yourself unfairly as your employee. I believe that if you signed the treaty in the circumstances you mentioned, your consent could be compromised by inappropriate and inappropriate influence. You can resign if you want. Is the training loan in my employment contract something that can be considered by the labour code as a protection of a company? Is the employment contract sufficient to bring legal action? I know my company`s borrowing policy, it is simple and very direct, can the amount be changed or adjusted after/during the trial or can the court completely deny the fees – if the company files a complaint against me or us? Before there was for me only one year of borrowing for 2 months of training in Japan, I would already like to leave the company and there are many good offers that I have missed/refused in the past because of the loan. I want to resign because my salary is no longer enough to meet our needs, besides I am a single mother and my son is already studying. Beyond compensation, work becomes extremely stressful, I feel that I am no longer efficient and effective for my role and that there is no self-fulfillment. It also affects my ability to be a mother-by-child because of the stress I feel at work. I always feel tired and sleepy.
The president of the Hanjin group, Efren Vinluan, told Rappler that if they accepted the agreement, they would have a hard time claiming the money they would have paid for their training loan. The remaining employees argued that management had “forced” them to sign as part of the company`s voluntary savings program. They are concerned, however, that the 3% reduction in training salary will not be returned to them, as it was not included in the package conditions. In any event, I see obligations as a form of job security. You can`t fire your wife because of education. If they fired her, their bond is null and void. If they fired her, their bond is null and void. Is the training loan in my employment contract something that, according to the labour code, can be considered a protection of a company? Is the employment contract sufficient to bring legal action? I know that my company`s credit policy is simple and very direct, can the amount be changed or adjusted after/during the trial, or can the court completely deny the fees – if the company files a complaint against me or against us? My wife has been working for a medical company for five years. Last year, they sent her to Singapore for a week of training. She had to sign a form stating that she would reimburse the company for the full training costs, plus 6 months` salary, if she resigned within three years. It`s probably 8:00.m. When it stops.
Does anyone who really knows the law have a glimpse? Now 3 years seems to be very long for engagement and seems illegal to me As a rule, there is a link for training. But training should not be mandatory, because it is related to that. The number of years and penalties is quite high in the case of your wife. During the dialogue between management and workers, DOLE Central Luzon Director Zenaida Campita Hanjin said they should make the training loan because of the closure. This agreement “binds” the employee to pay 3% of his salary twice for the next 10 years (or 5 years for some), simply to ensure that they do not suddenly leave the company after receiving training.