Many agreements can be certain, but it is by no means certain that citizens in the social and internal sector want their agreements to be legally binding. In Balfour/Balfour, Atkin LJ stated that Mr. Balfour`s agreement to pay $30 a month to his wife while working in Ceylon should be considered unenforceable, since people generally do not intend to draw the legal consequences. Similarly, an agreement between friends in a bar or a girl and her mother will fall into this sphere, but not a couple who is about to separate and not friends who make large transactions, especially when one is heavily dependent on the other`s assurances to his detriment.  This presumption of impracticality can always be rebutted by explicit consent, for example. B by the amortization of the agreement. On the other hand, it is considered almost conclusively that agreements between companies are enforceable.  But again, express words like “This provision… does not fall within the judicial jurisdiction of the courts.”  In one case, the law assumes that collective agreements between a union and an employer are not intended to establish legal relationships, allegedly to avoid excessive disputes under British labour law.  In a fourth case, the consequences of incapacity to work are more dramatic. Although the Crown Proceedings Act of 1947 allowed the government or state fumes to be sued on contracts in the same way as an ordinary person, where the law gives a public body the power to perform certain acts, the acts of representatives that go beyond that power will be ultra vires and non-abundant. The result is the same as for companies before the 1989 reform, so that entire chains of agreements could be declared non-existent.
Although commitments are made to be met, the parties are generally free to determine how a contract is terminated, can be terminated and remedy breaches, as they can generally determine the content of a contract. The courts have set only residual limits on the autonomy of the parties in order to determine how a contract expires. Court delay or Standard rules, which can normally be changed, are first and foremost that a contract is automatically concluded when it becomes impossible for a party to comply with the SS. Second, if one party seriously violates its side of the bargain, the other party can put an end to its own performance. If an offence is not serious, the innocent person must pursue his or her own commitments, but may seek legal action for the defective or imprecise benefit he has received. Third, the primary remedy for breach of contract is replacement damage limited to losses that can reasonably be expected to result from a breach. This means a sum of money to put the applicant in a regular situation, as if the offender had fulfilled her obligations.